{"id":1213,"date":"2010-01-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-07T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/google-books-condamne-pour-contrefacon\/"},"modified":"2026-06-26T08:57:30","modified_gmt":"2026-06-26T08:57:30","slug":"google-books-condamne-pour-contrefacon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/google-books-condamne-pour-contrefacon\/","title":{"rendered":"Google Books condamn\u00e9 pour contrefa\u00e7on"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Le 18 d\u00e9cembre 2009, le Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (Tribunal de grande instance de Paris, 3\u00e8meChambre, 2\u00e8me Section, 18 d\u00e9cembre 2009) a condamn\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9ditrice du c\u00e9l\u00e8bre moteur de recherche pour contrefa\u00e7on de droits d\u2019auteur<\/p>\n<p>Plusieurs soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9ditions reprochaient \u00e0 Google, via son services Google Books, de num\u00e9riser, r\u00e9f\u00e9rencer et mettre \u00e0 la disposition des internautes, des \u0153uvres litt\u00e9raires, sans avoir acquis au pr\u00e9alable l\u2019autorisation des titulaires de droits<\/p>\n<p>Le Tribunal commence par rappeler que la loi nationale s\u2019applique en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la France \u00e9tant \u00ab  le pays qui entretient les liens les plus \u00e9troits avec le litige \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>Selon le Tribunal, la num\u00e9risation d\u2019une \u0153uvre constitue une reproduction n\u00e9cessitant l\u2019autorisation pr\u00e9alable de l\u2019auteur ou de ses ayants droits. En s\u2019abstenant d\u2019obtenir une telle autorisation aupr\u00e8s des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s \u00e9ditrices, Google s\u2019est rendu coupable de contrefa\u00e7ons<\/p>\n<p>Le Tribunal rejette l\u2019application de l\u2019exception de courte citation invoqu\u00e9e par les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s d\u00e9fenderesses, \u00ab d\u00e8s lors que les couvertures concern\u00e9es sont communiqu\u00e9es au public dans leur int\u00e9gralit\u00e9, m\u00eame en format r\u00e9duit, et que l\u2019aspect al\u00e9atoire du choix des extraits repr\u00e9sent\u00e9s d\u00e9nie tout but d\u2019information tel que pr\u00e9vu par l\u2019article L. 122-5 3\u00b0 du Code de la Propri\u00e9t\u00e9 Intellectuelle \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>Google est ainsi condamn\u00e9e au paiement de 300 000 euros de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats et \u00e0 l\u2019arr\u00eat imm\u00e9diat de ses agissements<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 18 d\u00e9cembre 2009, le Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (Tribunal de grande instance de Paris, 3\u00e8meChambre, 2\u00e8me Section, 18 d\u00e9cembre 2009) a condamn\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9ditrice du c\u00e9l\u00e8bre moteur de recherche pour contrefa\u00e7on de droits d\u2019auteur Plusieurs soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9ditions reprochaient \u00e0 Google, via son services Google Books, de num\u00e9riser, r\u00e9f\u00e9rencer et mettre \u00e0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":280,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_angie_page":false,"page_builder":"","footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"annee":[60],"expertise":[32],"class_list":["post-1213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-le-cabinet","annee-60","expertise-it-donnees-personnelles"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1213"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1213\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2032,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1213\/revisions\/2032"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/280"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1213"},{"taxonomy":"annee","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/annee?post=1213"},{"taxonomy":"expertise","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/expertise?post=1213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}