La chambre sociale de la Cour de cassation a rendu un arr\u00eat int\u00e9ressant sur le harc\u00e8lement moral le 10 novembre 2009 (Cass. soc. 10 nov. 2009, n\u00b0 08-41.497 P+B+R)<\/p>\n
En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, une salari\u00e9e a saisi la juridiction prud’homale d’une demande de r\u00e9siliation judiciaire de son contrat de travail, pour harc\u00e8lement moral (notamment)<\/p>\n
Les juges du fond n’ont pas retenu le caract\u00e8re de harc\u00e8lement moral des faits incrimin\u00e9s. Pour eux, il appartenait \u00e0 la salari\u00e9e de d\u00e9montrer que ces agissements relevaient d’une d\u00e9marche volontaire, destin\u00e9e \u00e0 l’atteindre et permettant de pr\u00e9sumer l’existence d’un harc\u00e8lement<\/p>\n
La Cour de cassation censure cette d\u00e9cision. Elle consid\u00e8re que le harc\u00e8lement moral est constitu\u00e9 d\u00e8s lors que sont caract\u00e9ris\u00e9s des agissements r\u00e9p\u00e9t\u00e9s, et ce ind\u00e9pendamment de l’intention de l’auteur. D\u00e8s lors qu’il existe des agissements r\u00e9p\u00e9t\u00e9s ayant pour effet une d\u00e9gradation des conditions de travail susceptibles de porter atteinte aux droits et \u00e0 la dignit\u00e9 du salari\u00e9, d’alt\u00e9rer sa sant\u00e9 ou de compromettre son avenir professionnel, le harc\u00e8lement moral est caract\u00e9ris\u00e9, peu importe l’intention de l’auteur des faits<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
La chambre sociale de la Cour de cassation a rendu un arr\u00eat int\u00e9ressant sur le harc\u00e8lement moral le 10 novembre 2009 (Cass. soc. 10 nov. 2009, n\u00b0 08-41.497 P+B+R) En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, une salari\u00e9e a saisi la juridiction prud’homale d’une demande de r\u00e9siliation judiciaire de son contrat de travail, pour harc\u00e8lement moral (notamment) Les juges du […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":284,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_angie_page":false,"page_builder":"","footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"annee":[59],"expertise":[30],"class_list":["post-1210","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-le-cabinet","annee-59","expertise-social"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1210","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1210"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1210\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2036,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1210\/revisions\/2036"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/284"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1210"},{"taxonomy":"annee","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/annee?post=1210"},{"taxonomy":"expertise","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/expertise?post=1210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}