{"id":1197,"date":"2009-08-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-26T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/pas-de-caractere-distinctif-pour-une-marque-reproduisant-une-partie-du-produit\/"},"modified":"2026-06-26T08:57:37","modified_gmt":"2026-06-26T08:57:37","slug":"pas-de-caractere-distinctif-pour-une-marque-reproduisant-une-partie-du-produit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/pas-de-caractere-distinctif-pour-une-marque-reproduisant-une-partie-du-produit\/","title":{"rendered":"Pas de caract\u00e8re distinctif pour une marque reproduisant une partie du produit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Le jugement du TGI de Paris du 30 avril 2009 r\u00e9cemment publi\u00e9 au PIBD alimente un courant qu\u2019on pourrait appeler la \u201cjurisprudence des t\u00eates\u201c en jugeant une nouvelle fois que la repr\u00e9sentation d&rsquo;un visage ne peut \u00eatre d\u00e9pos\u00e9e \u00e0 titre de marque<\/p>\n<p>En l&rsquo;esp\u00e8ce, c&rsquo;est la t\u00eate de la c\u00e9l\u00e8bre Barbie de Mattel qui est vis\u00e9e. Ainsi, la commercialisation d&rsquo;une poup\u00e9e ressemblant \u00e0 Barbie porte atteinte aux droits d&rsquo;auteur de Matel mais non \u00e0 la marque communautaire portant sur la photo de la t\u00eate de Barbie<\/p>\n<p>Il a \u00e9t\u00e9 en effet  jug\u00e9 que si cette photo a une fonction d\u00e9corative et esth\u00e9tique, elle est d\u00e9pourvue de tout caract\u00e8re distinctif<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le jugement du TGI de Paris du 30 avril 2009 r\u00e9cemment publi\u00e9 au PIBD alimente un courant qu\u2019on pourrait appeler la \u201cjurisprudence des t\u00eates\u201c en jugeant une nouvelle fois que la repr\u00e9sentation d&rsquo;un visage ne peut \u00eatre d\u00e9pos\u00e9e \u00e0 titre de marque En l&rsquo;esp\u00e8ce, c&rsquo;est la t\u00eate de la c\u00e9l\u00e8bre Barbie de Mattel qui est [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":282,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_angie_page":false,"page_builder":"","footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"annee":[59],"expertise":[29],"class_list":["post-1197","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-le-cabinet","annee-59","expertise-propriete-intellectuelle"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1197","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1197"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1197\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2047,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1197\/revisions\/2047"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/282"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1197"},{"taxonomy":"annee","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/annee?post=1197"},{"taxonomy":"expertise","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/expertise?post=1197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}