La Cour de Cassation vient de r\u00e9affirmer, dans un arr\u00eat du 13 janvier 2009, le pouvoir accord\u00e9 aux agents asserment\u00e9s de la SACEM de constater les actes de contrefa\u00e7on commis sur l\u2019Internet, d\u2019identifier et de poursuivre l\u2019internaute contrefacteur Dans cette affaire, un agent asserment\u00e9 de la SACEM ayant constat\u00e9 des actes de contrefa\u00e7on, avait r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 identifier un internaute qui avait t\u00e9l\u00e9charg\u00e9 ill\u00e9galement des fichiers et les avait mis en partage. Cependant, la Cour d\u2019Appel de Rennes avait annul\u00e9 la proc\u00e9dure au motif que l\u2019agent avait pu identifier l\u2019internaute gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 l\u2019adresse IP de au nom de FAI de ce dernier, informations pour lesquelles la CNIL aurait du pr\u00e9alablement donn\u00e9 son accord<\/p>\n
La cour de cassation a cass\u00e9 l\u2019arr\u00eat et consid\u00e9rer que de tels pouvoirs reviennent \u00e0 l\u2019agent asserment\u00e9 de la SACEM et qu\u2019ils ne constituent pas un traitement de donn\u00e9es \u00e0 caract\u00e8re personnel. Notons enfin, qu\u2019en dehors de toute proc\u00e9dure judiciaire, ce \u00ab privil\u00e8ge \u00bb n\u2019est pas reconnu aux huissiers de justic<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
La Cour de Cassation vient de r\u00e9affirmer, dans un arr\u00eat du 13 janvier 2009, le pouvoir accord\u00e9 aux agents asserment\u00e9s de la SACEM de constater les actes de contrefa\u00e7on commis sur l\u2019Internet, d\u2019identifier et de poursuivre l\u2019internaute contrefacteur Dans cette affaire, un agent asserment\u00e9 de la SACEM ayant constat\u00e9 des actes de contrefa\u00e7on, avait r\u00e9ussi […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":282,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_angie_page":false,"page_builder":"","footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"annee":[59],"expertise":[29],"class_list":["post-1181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-le-cabinet","annee-59","expertise-propriete-intellectuelle"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1181"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1181\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2054,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1181\/revisions\/2054"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/282"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1181"},{"taxonomy":"annee","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/annee?post=1181"},{"taxonomy":"expertise","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/expertise?post=1181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}