{"id":1143,"date":"2008-02-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-02-18T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/google-adwords-google-a-nouveau-condamne-pour-contrefacon-ca-paris-1er-fevrier-2008\/"},"modified":"2026-06-26T08:57:49","modified_gmt":"2026-06-26T08:57:49","slug":"google-adwords-google-a-nouveau-condamne-pour-contrefacon-ca-paris-1er-fevrier-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/google-adwords-google-a-nouveau-condamne-pour-contrefacon-ca-paris-1er-fevrier-2008\/","title":{"rendered":"Google Adwords : Google \u00e0 nouveau condamn\u00e9 pour contrefa\u00e7on (CA Paris 1er f\u00e9vrier 2008)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dans son arr\u00eat en date du 1er f\u00e9vrier 2008, la Cour d&rsquo;appel de Paris a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Google jouait un r\u00f4le actif dans la mise en \u0153uvre du service publicitaire Adwords. <\/p>\n<p>Pour la Cour \u00ab le fait ici incrimin\u00e9 n\u2019est pas le choix par les annonceurs d\u2019un signe d\u00e9pos\u00e9 \u00e0 titre de marque mais le choix de Google de reproduire, en r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 une sollicitation d\u2019un annonceur, un ou des signes d\u00e9pos\u00e9s \u00e0 titre de marque \u00bb. <\/p>\n<p>Cette d\u00e9cision rappelle la solution d\u00e9j\u00e0 retenue par la Cour d&rsquo;appel d&rsquo;Aix-en Provence dans son arr\u00eat du 6 d\u00e9cembre 2007.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dans son arr\u00eat en date du 1er f\u00e9vrier 2008, la Cour d&rsquo;appel de Paris a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Google jouait un r\u00f4le actif dans la mise en \u0153uvre du service publicitaire Adwords. Pour la Cour \u00ab le fait ici incrimin\u00e9 n\u2019est pas le choix par les annonceurs d\u2019un signe d\u00e9pos\u00e9 \u00e0 titre de marque [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":280,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_angie_page":false,"page_builder":"","footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"annee":[58],"expertise":[32],"class_list":["post-1143","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-le-cabinet","annee-58","expertise-it-donnees-personnelles"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1143","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1143"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1143\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2073,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1143\/revisions\/2073"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/280"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1143"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1143"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1143"},{"taxonomy":"annee","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/annee?post=1143"},{"taxonomy":"expertise","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wan-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/expertise?post=1143"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}